噪声对建筑工人冒险行为的诱发机制研究

doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.003

中国安全科学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 16-23.doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn 1003-3033.2020.12.003

• 安全社会科学与安全管理 • 上一篇下一篇

噪声对建筑工人冒险行为的诱发机制研究

叶贵^1,2 教授, 陈俐莹^1,2, 冯新怡^1,2, 杨晶晶^1,2, 越宏哲^1,2

1 重庆大学管理科学与房地产学院,重庆 400045;
2 重庆大学可持续建设国际研究中心, 重庆 400045

收稿日期:2020-09-12 修回日期:2020-11-07 出版日期:2020-12-28 发布日期:2021-07-15
作者简介:叶贵 (1976—),男,四川三台人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事建筑安全、健康城市等方面的研究。E-mail:yegui760404@126.com。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(71972020, 71471023);重庆市研究生科研创新项目资助(CYB19053)。

Study on inducing mechanism of construction workers' risk-taking behavior by noise

YE Gui^1,2, CHEN Liying^1,2, FENG Xinyi^1,2, YANG Jingjing^1,2, YUE Hongzhe^1,2

1 School of Management Science and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China;
2 International Research Center for Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China

Received:2020-09-12 Revised:2020-11-07 Online:2020-12-28 Published:2021-07-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为揭示施工噪声诱发冒险行为的机制,提高安全绩效,基于最大适应性理论和风险情感理论,构建施工噪声诱发建筑工人冒险行为的心理机制模型,采用事件相关电位(ERP)技术开展脑神经试验,研究不同声音条件下建筑工人的行为变化和心理特性。结果表明:噪声能影响信息感知、加工过程,与安静环境相比,高水平施工噪声诱发P2、P3、晚正电位(LPP)成分更大的波幅,促进自我损耗和奖赏寻求倾向,从而导致行为决策的反应时间延长、冒险行为增加。

关键词: 施工噪声, 建筑工人, 冒险行为, 诱发机制, 事件相关电位(ERP), 脑神经试验

Abstract: In order to reveal mechanism of risk-taking behavior induced by construction noise so as to improve safety performance, a psychological mechanism model of it was established based on maximum adaptability and risk-as-feelings theories. Then, brain nerve experiments were conducted by utilizing ERP technique, and behavioral changes and psychological characteristics of construction workers under different sound conditions were studied. The results show that noise can affect information perception and processing. Compared with cases of quiet environment, high level construction noise induces greater amplitude of P2, P3 and LPP components, which promotes self-depletion and reward-seeking tendency, resulting in longer response time for behavioral decision-making and an increase of risk-taking behavior.

Key words: inducing noise, construction worker, risk-taking behavior, causation mechanism, event-related potential (ERP), cranial nerve experiment

中图分类号:

X911

叶贵, 陈俐莹, 冯新怡, 杨晶晶, 越宏哲. 噪声对建筑工人冒险行为的诱发机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(12): 16-23.

YE Gui, CHEN Liying, FENG Xinyi, YANG Jingjing, YUE Hongzhe. Study on inducing mechanism of construction workers' risk-taking behavior by noise[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020, 30(12): 16-23.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.住房和城乡建设部办公厅关于2019年房屋市政工程生产安全事故情况的通报 [EB/OL].[2020-06-19]. http://www.mohurd.gov.cn/wjfb/202006/t20200624_246031.html.
[2] 贾明涛.行为安全管理在施工中的应用分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(7): 169-173.
JIA Mingtao. Application analysis of behavior-based safety management in construction[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012,8(7): 169-173.
[3] MAN S S,CHAN A H S,WONG H M. Risk-taking behaviors of Hong Kong construction workers-a thematic study[J]. Safety Science, 2017,98(5): 25-36.
[4] SYNDICUS M, WIESE B S, TREECK C V. In the heat and noise of the moment: effects on risky decision making[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2018,50(1): 3-27.
[5] BASNER M, BABISCH W, DAVIS A, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health[J]. The Lancet, 2014, 383(9925): 1 325-1 332.
[6] LEE S C, HONG J Y, JEON J Y. Effects of acoustic characteristics of combined construction noise on annoyance[J]. Building & Environment, 2015, 92(5): 657-667.
[7] SAZLMA J L, HCOCK P A. Noise effects on human performance: a meta-analytic synthesis[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2011, 137(4): 682-707.
[8] LU Xueqing, DAVIS S. How sounds influence user safety decisions in a virtual construction simulator[J]. Safety Science, 2016, 86(2): 184-194.
[9] ROBERTS K R, DIMSDALE J, EAST P, et al. Adolescent emotional response to music and its relationship to risk-taking behaviors[J]. Journal of Adolescent Health, 1998, 23(1): 49-54.
[10] BRODSKY W. The effects of music tempo on simulated driving performance and vehicular control[J]. Transportation Research Part F Psychology & Behaviour, 2001, 4(4): 219-241.
[11] HALKO M L, KAUSTIA M. Risk on / risk off: risk-taking varies with subjectively preferred and disliked music[J]. Plos One, 2015, 10(8): 1-16.
[12] 叶贵,越宏哲,杨晶晶,等.建筑工人认知水平对不安全行为影响仿真研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(9): 36-42.
YE Gui, YUE Hongzhe, YANG Jingjing, et al. Simulation study on influences of construction workers' bounded rational cognition on unsafe behaviors [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(9): 36-42.
[13] 张殿业,程静,张艺.情绪对驾驶行为影响研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2018,28(10): 19-24.
ZHANG Dianye, CHENG Jing, ZHANG Yi. Influences of emotions on driving behaviors [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018,28(10): 19-24.
[14] LOEWENSTEIN G F, WEBER E U, HSEE C K, et al. Risk as feelings[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2001,127(2): 267-286.
[15] HANCOCK P A, WARM J S. A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention[J]. Human Factors the Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,1989,31(5): 519-537.
[16] GBZ2.2—2007,工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第2部分:物理因素[S].
GBZ2.2-2007, Occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace Physical agents[S].
[17] 韩伟伟,王晶.产品设计与性能冲突对消费者决策过程的神经学影响[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(2): 155-168.
HAN Weiwei, WANG Jing. Neurological impact of the conflict between product design and performance on consumer decision process [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2017,20(2): 155-168.
[18] CLAYSON P E, LARSON M J. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2011, 49(7): 1 953-1 961.
[19] 付艺蕾,罗跃嘉,崔芳.选择一致性影响结果评价的ERP研究[J].心理学报,2017,49(8): 1 089-1 099.
FU Yilei, LUO Yuejia, CUI Fang. Consistency of choice modulates outcome evaluation: Evidence from ERP studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2017,49(8): 1 089-1 099.
[20] LIU Tao, LIN Chichiuan C, HUANG Kuochen, et al. Effects of noise type, noise intensity, and illumination intensity on reading performance[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2017, 120(1): 70-74.
[21] HOCKEY G R. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework[J]. Biological Psychology, 1997, 45(1/2/3): 73-93.
[22] PECHMANN, CORNELIA. A comparison of health communication models: risk learning versus stereotype priming[J]. Media Psychology, 2001, 3(2): 189-210.
[23] 窦凯,聂衍刚,王玉洁,等.自我损耗促进冲动决策:来自行为和ERPs的证据[J].心理学报,2014,46(10): 1 564-1 579.
DOU Kai, NIE Yangang, WANG Yujie, et al. Ego depletion promotes impulsive decision: evidences from behavioral and ERPs studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014,46(10): 1 564-1 579.

噪声对建筑工人冒险行为的诱发机制研究

Study on inducing mechanism of construction workers' risk-taking behavior by noise

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张萌, 韩豫, 刘泽锋. 深度学习下建筑工人高空安全防护装备检测方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(5): 140-146.
[2]	刘耀, 焦双健. ST-GCN在建筑工人不安全动作识别中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(4): 30-35.
[3]	石娟, 常丁懿, 郑鹏. 基于BP神经网络的建筑工人不安全行为预警模型^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2022, 32(1): 27-33.
[4]	李琰, 毛钰, 张燕. 建筑工人应急行为影响机制^*[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 1-7.
[5]	陈梅, 祁神军, 牛达钰, 张云波, 吴国来. 主观社会支持对建筑工人心理及不安全行为的影响[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(1): 30-37.
[6]	叶贵, 李学征, 向卿婷, 越宏哲. 建筑工人故意违章行为动机形成机制研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(8): 12-17.
[7]	叶贵, 越宏哲, 冯新怡, 李元莉, 陈俐莹. 建筑工人不安全行为的认知失效致因仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 6-12.
[8]	陈文涛, 杨志全, 朱颖彦, 张智伟, 张杰, 罗志刚. 阿塔巴德滑坡形成条件与诱发机制分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2020, 30(11): 148-155.
[9]	叶贵, 越宏哲, 杨晶晶, 冯新怡, 王玉合. 建筑工人认知水平对不安全行为影响仿真研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(9): 36-42.
[10]	李祥春, 王焕, 张霈, 吕金宝, 陈泽宇, 李琴. 冒险行为下人的生理参数变化特征研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(11): 1-7.
[11]	李建强, 陈瑞雅. 注意瞬脱效应对驾驶安全性影响的ERP试验研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(8): 13-18.
[12]	黄芹芹, 祁神军, 张云波, 成家磊. 建筑工人习惯性不安全行为干预策略的SD模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 25-31.
[13]	王新成, 孙继德, 张召普, 王海峰, 黄宇. 企业提供与建筑工人参加安全培训的博弈研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(7): 159-164.
[14]	白正宗, 袁永博, 张明媛. 基于智能手机的建筑工人躯干姿势危险评估方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2018, 28(1): 81-86.
[15]	韩豫, 刘嘉伦, 张泾杰, 冯志达. 建筑工人危险认知结果的差异特性[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(9): 20-26.